ssossossossosso

Forums

Covering OroCRM topics, including community updates and company announcements.  Subscribe

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Yurii Muratov 2 months, 1 week ago.

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #28985

    Hi All,

    Could you please advice on following question.
    In our application we are going to use only one organization — default one.
    Can we change some parts of the ownership scope by removing organization?
    What we are going to do:
    # not add/remove column organization_id from entities
    # not add/remove “organization_field_name”=”organization” and “organization_column_name”=”organization_id” from entities config.
    # the ownership scope will be presented by

    So, will we face any unexpected issues with this?
    Is it ok to configure entities on this way or it’s not recommended at all?

    Thanks in advance

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #28986

    akhristiansen
    Participant

    I think that can cause some issues. I`m not recommend you to remove this config field.

    • This reply was modified 2 months, 2 weeks ago by  akhristiansen.
    #28988

    Yurii Muratov
    Participant

    Hi, aliaksandra.chyrkova.
    It is not recommend to remove the organization field name and organization column name from the ownership parameter in case if the owner type is USER or BUSUNESS_UNIT. All the code that works with such ownership types expects organization field and column data.

Viewing 2 replies - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.